I saw this game played by my cousin and I was intrigued with the fine graphics and scenarios so in my curiosity, I started to play the game. To my surprise, the game really delivered in terms of game play and cool environment. What I also like with this game is the pacing; it can adjust to my own pace so I am not pressured to finish on level and can stop anytime I want - perfect for in between work! (oops, lol)

I have to agree. There is actually one game I've seen just recent, Mission Against Terror, and I must say it fits the bill of a stand out game. It has nice, crisp graphic environment and smooth game play, not to mention a good storyline.

Battlefield 3 FTW, man.

Battlefield 3. Forever.

Conclusion:
every new fantasy multiplayer game is a rip-off of world of world craft and every new FPS game is a clone of call of duty (not counting AOS ofcourse).
modern multiplayer game indiustry SUCKS BALLS!
The only good multiplayer game that I know that got an original gameplay and original ideas in it is mount&blade (thanks god for manual sword and bow attacks, tough i have to say its not FPS or a fantasy something game ).

@Drewgon
Oh fuck man that's really true. I remember there was a F2P FPS vs. RTS-style game called Battleswarm: Field of Honor. Sadly the company ran out of funds and they had to sell it to another company for kid's games. And since the game wasn't intended for minor ages, they had to shut it down.

If you look at some of the highest game sales of all time they mostly consist of CoD and other shooters. Marketers are stupid and only see the money. So the marketers tell the designers that the company wants shooters or your fired. Then the designers try to make a new game made of mostly old and well tested ideas. Then when the "new" game is shipped out the gaming people buy the game, no matter how much of a clone it is. Now, because people bought the game they make at least fifty remakes where very little changes. All of this is pissing off the people who are now bored of the clones, but the markets only hear the consumers.

So here is our problem. There is no way to deal with this. If we don't buy others will. And if we do buy they will make more.

Why is this general gameplay exactly?

SF? SourceForts? :D

Actually, it sounds like it would be a cool type of game.

You're damn right it is...

The reason for this is that they sell.

A company will put anything out if they know it will sell.

CSS + SF =?

I think we see a CSS or SF look-alike almost every month, don't you think it's getting a bit crowded for these games?

Actually, it sounds like it would be a cool type of game.

I've seen this game played by a cousin and I was intrigued with the fine graphics. But really, who's up for gladiator games now anyway?

honestly i would rather mortar launchers than rpgs, they fit better

@MD: Not to mention that it'd be a bitch to play Skyrim on older PCs. :/

i just ask for that as a joke

Actually, Skyrim would be amazing with fully destructable buildings. Like Red Faction Guerilla with a fantasy setting.

@ Modifier
he said so during the .53 beta test, the day before .54 came out. i was playing with him in a vanilla server that was advertised on the forums. ask him about it.

Well I guess with damage of grenades and low ammo it could work and it does sound like a fun way to destroy enemy bases but games like this have to be desighned with grifers in mind sadly :(

@Mr. Freeze: Simple words for you, bud: Prove it. Where'd Ben say this?

@ Chokel

Skyrim would suck if you could break what you wanted! And propelled grenades? You could just cross-map-tube a dragon if you wanted to. And your last sentence made no sense.

Id say rpg's would have the destruction and damage capabilities of a grenade, but it can be aimed, and since it is rocket propelled, it would have little to no arc and an instant explosion. The ammo should be 2/6, reload takes 5 seconds, rof is 2 seconds.
That would make it useful but not overpowered.

As for vehicles...it would be a jeep like thing that take you 1.5 times faster than foot, you can't shoot, it takes 2 seconds to get on and 2 seconds to get off. You could run people over for instant kill, its turning capabilities are bad, and if you fall off a cliff, it would explode like a grenade, kill you. the vehicle would reset in 15 seconds, and would act as a grenade and kill surrounding enemies. Two people can go in one jeep. There is a stationary machine gun on top with 50/500 ammo which resets when you pass a tank or it gets blown up. The machine gun doesnt have as much recoil as a smg, but has slightly higher rof, but its accuracy is bad, and the damage is lower, and it takes 5 hits to destroy a block.

Those are my ideas on how these should be implemented into the game

@Freeze: As long as I still get to shoot unsuspecting foot soldiers in the face, I should be fine. :P

@Freeze: As long as I still get to shoot unsuspecting foot soldiers in the face, I should be fine. :P

ffs guys
ben said that RPGs would get in if vehicles came around...and he's been pushing vehicles for a while. so enjoy ur butthurt when both are introduced, ill be over here enjoying new gameplay features.

But that's fun for them, we shouldn't ruin anybody's fun by preventing them from doing this.

Oh, wait.

You might do that, but others would stand on the base and destroy everything in sight

In a game where every block can be destroyed why on gods green earth would you not add RPG's. as it reads when you click on website "build, break and battle". some people just want to keep this game a boring repeatative sniperfest with no interest in utlilzing the build features or new exiting weapons or gameplay features. instead of me being killed over and over again by a sniper I want to fire my rpg at his sniper nest, and let him relize that theres a new guy in town.