<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Ace of Spades Game Forums &#187; Topic: So answer me this quick question</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</link>
<description>Ace of Spades Game Forums &#187; Topic: So answer me this quick question</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Spengbab on "So answer me this quick question"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=4211#post-58764</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Spengbab</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">58764@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Although that would've been the best way to go about with the whole thing, I never went through with it, only because I missed way more when I did it that way.</p>
<p>However, the target.png is centered (I think), so all you would have to do is modify your scope/sight so that it's matched up with the target.png when you ADS. In order to check the alignment, just spam right-click so that the two dots overlap eachother on the center of the screen.</p>
<p>I think that works.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sample246 on "So answer me this quick question"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=4211#post-58761</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sample246</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">58761@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Spengbab: So did it become standard to off-center the dot by a pixel to compensate? Or did that not work?
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Viper on "So answer me this quick question"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=4211#post-58757</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Viper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">58757@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Yeah I use the semi and they're all off.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Spengbab on "So answer me this quick question"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=4211#post-58753</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Spengbab</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">58753@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Everyone just got used to it, I think.</p>
<p>Also, it's not just the SMG, the semi has it as well. Shifts your .png southwest by 1 pixel.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Viper on "So answer me this quick question"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=4211#post-58751</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Viper</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">58751@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>BOOM made a more accurate scope that I use. The center dot was off.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sample246 on "So answer me this quick question"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=4211#post-58747</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sample246</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">58747@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>When .54 first came out, reports of custom SMG sights indicated that there was a glitch that lead to inaccuracy. To stay on the safe side, I've kept all default models, but I haven't heard of anyone talking about this issue for some time. Was it resolved?
</p></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
