E+trolls=M

I would rate this a big fat S

PineApples+1/PineApples :D

E = Everyone

[WARNIING = Game Exerience May Change Online]

gameplay - 8/10
Online community - 9/10
In Game players - 5/10

Ben is making me nervously by randomly posting on the forums

8/10

Online interactions not rated by the ESRB.

there's some stuff that piss me and make me wanna choke a hoe

My thoughts exactly.

i give it a 8/10 its still fun as hell but there's some stuff that piss me and make me wanna choke a hoe

lol dont wanna be rude just most people are arseholes not most them but some soz lol
still love the game tho

bcoolface ^_^ is my hero

s'alright

7/10 everyone moans about griefers and the community isent great

Call me DEADSHOT ......

@Deadshot Hey Percy, err sorry should I call you Parker Mclarin, or Deadshot now?
Anyway I would rate this game 7/10.

Rated M for mantastic.

Rated F for Faggtory
Jk I rate O for Okay

rated M for mannly

99.9/100

^I put in more 0's, so ha

999,999/1,000,000

6.5/10 atm.

i would probably also give it a 7 or 8/10, it's a pretty good game, but it gets boring, sometimes

$ nuff said

Vanilla Server Beta .54: I give it a 7/10, based fully off the game and not the people who play it (I.E. Griefers).

Pyspades Server Beta .54: 10/10. No questions asked.

@Galaxy: No, you aren't alone in your complaints. I'd give 0.52 and earlier an 8 or 9, the only real complaints I had with them were the lack of good admin controls, a complaint I still have now, and the annoying raycasting, which has been fixed.

Actually, the improved voxel rendering is the only 0.54 feature I'm sure I like.

@1337101

Lol, I always feel like a scumbag for being one of the only people who consistently complains about the cone/server-side hit verification.

Anyway, I'd also give this game a 7/10.

I would seriously rate this game a 10 out of 10 if we were to have 0.52's game mechanics back but with the SMG. I don't mean "10 out of 10" in comparison to mainstream, big-name games (even though it is better than a lot of popular titles), but compared to other relatively unknown indie games, it is (was) incredibly fun and addictive.

^ very well described

I'd give it a 7/10 for an early beta. It's a fun concept and the gameplay is nice, but there's still a lot of needed features missing from the game, and some of the updates have made the game a bit less fun, rather than more fun... (yes, I'm talking about the cone again).

As far as kid-friendliness goes, I'd give the game itself an A 10+, since the violence isn't particularly graphic. Of course, it varies with server... a well-moderated build-only would be an A, some other poorly-supervised servers would be an M.