I've pondering about this last day and I need you to read through this entirely and not randomly answer something.

If we send for example a copy of Duke Nukem Forever to gearbox/3D Realms so they don't have to do so long over it. Will that cause:

A: A paradox, because they would have then never made it. And they would have never sent it back in time.
B: Normal flow of time. Cause they have the object, and create a new timeline where they don't take so long about it to make it.

what

lol

/facepalm

C. It will cause them to see that they have made a crappy game in the future and thus they would work on the game 25 years to make it awesome which would cause nuclear explosions through every moment in time and space (The first rule of my teacher in physics- awesomeness=explosions, don't ask).

Time travel is impossible, hence your question is voided.

^ Noone knows that.

Wait what? Send it back in time? Nothing would happen then.

^Time travel is impossible.
If time travel existed, we would've sent ourselves back in time and history would change, and we would never notice, therefore we would never notice time travel in the first place.

@MegaDeuce During an experiment with the CERN Supercollider a neutrino seemed to be moving faster than light. That would mean we could send information back in time. (As Notch said)

^Nope!
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110922/full/news.2011.554.html
It refutes Einstein's theory of relativity and thus makes time travel theoretically possible :D

@[HK]Frosty
Parallel universe would be created at the point of divergence. THIS scheme tells everything.

Have you ever watched the movie Back to the future? It uses the same theory.

DOCTOR WHO!

they would make soemthing that took the time to make a good non linier shitty games and not hire the super lazy asses

Time travel is soooooo impossible. If Cern's neutrinos are really going faster than light, it just means that things can go faster than light, and the new universal speed limit would be the "speed of neutrino".