<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Ace of Spades Game Forums &#187; Tag: greifer - Recent Posts</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</link>
<description>Ace of Spades Game Forums &#187; Tag: greifer - Recent Posts</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Kaede-chan (かえでーちゃん) on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27165</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kaede-chan (かえでーちゃん)</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27165@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Simply don't allow teamswitching unless there is a large imbalance in team size, and even then, limit to once an hour per person.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Null on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27164</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Null</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27164@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>I don't think that's such a good idea danhezee.  It's currently nigh impossible to get people just to votekick on most servers even when the subject of the kick is a speedhacker or something similar.  Voting for team switching would cause perpetually imbalanced teams.  For example, if blue were overpowered and I wanted to switch to even things up I would not only have to motivate x% of the server to vote for my switch but I would also be faced with most of the server (the imbalanced team) wanting to win.  Tell me, if you're winning how willing are you to give up the numbers advantage?
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>danhezee on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27154</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>danhezee</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27154@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>That has happened since the game came out.  I would say it is one of the most aggravating aspect forms of cheating.  I would like see team switching be voting on before a player is allowed to swap sides.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kono on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27131</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kono</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27131@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.php?quickkey=9hxu5odgvbhpng7&#038;thumb=5" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.php?quickkey=9hxu5odgvbhpng7&#038;thumb=5</a></p>
<p>here's documented proof on the server of the hypocrisy on the server
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kono on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27128</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kono</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27128@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>meh, its the principle, but i successfully greifed their green church as blue, so all is as it should be now
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>1337101 on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27123</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>1337101</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27123@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Any and all enemy structures are fair game.</p>
<p>So yes, if you screw up a green fort as a blue, you're doing nothing wrong.  It's green's problem for not defending their stuff better.</p>
<p>And teamswitching to move intel... I can't say I've seen many examples of that.  Besides, I like raiding large strongholds.  The multiple rooms and passages aid raiders by providing cover.  Sometimes raiding a fort is easier than grabbing intel that's in the open.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kono on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27121</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kono</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27121@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Griefed it playing as blue and got kicked by the greens.......WTF.</p>
<p>I usually dont encourage people to do this but grief that fucking church
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Exile on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27118</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Exile</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27118@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>man, sounds like a good idea, actually. I've always wanted the enemy to carry the Intel into easily defended structures.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fighterlegend on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27114</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Fighterlegend</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27114@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>That's more of the admins part.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kono on "mat^2&#039;s server - pyspades //New Cheating Report//"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=2218#post-27113</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kono</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27113@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Sup, Kono here.</p>
<p>Ive discovered a new form of cheating we'll call it "TehJazz" form cheating on mat^2's server.</p>
<p>We have a player "TehJazz", he plays on blue team, but hangs with green's team holds a green block to show he is with them, then grabs intel and moves it to a green stronghold.</p>
<p>He switches to green and the game continues. </p>
<p>He claims there are no rules and you can do whatever switching teams, greifing whatever. So I switch teams to greif their stronghold and get kicked?</p>
<p>Apparently there are no rules so long as it favors the greens.....
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>adrix89 on "Greifer Proof Ideas"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=366#post-3129</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>adrix89</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3129@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Actually fancy stuff is a form of griefing in itself<br />
I was in a game where the whole team was building fancy stuff in the base<br />
It wasn't even on Intel so the greens were scoring points with no problem<br />
I had the blow the shit up(the smartasses didn't realize that the tent is basically infinite nades) out of my own base to get them to get out and on the front line
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>seifer on "Greifer Proof Ideas"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=366#post-3061</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>seifer</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3061@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Trotski is right. This is a war game; when making structures the key thing is function, not form. We don't NEED to have ornate buildings/bridges everywhere.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sanke on "Greifer Proof Ideas"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=366#post-3058</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sanke</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3058@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Wait for admin tools and play on a heavily admin'd server
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trotski on "Greifer Proof Ideas"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=366#post-2952</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Trotski</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2952@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Not to mention the annoyance of having a popup on your screen whilst in the middle of combat..</p>
<p>Annoying as it is, destruction is it part of the game.</p>
<p>So don't bother getting fancy if you dont want to waste time to have it destroyed.</p>
<p>Just make simple and effective buildings, and destroy everyone elses.</p>
<p>Smart, no?
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MajorDonut on "Greifer Proof Ideas"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=366#post-2939</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MajorDonut</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2939@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>I actually thought about that lols.. but then i thought the idea would lead to another way of griefing so sorry.
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>JesseQ on "Greifer Proof Ideas"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=366#post-2925</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JesseQ</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2925@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>Mmmmm.. NO. Then all kinds of trolls would just build unnecessary things such as lift base high up in the air, when someone wants to get it back down, then just "Oh no, I don't think I want you to destroy my griefing!". This would cover map with pointless blocks spread across the map..
</p></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Black_Hound on "Greifer Proof Ideas"</title>
<link>http://forumarchive.spadille.net/topic.php?id=366#post-2917</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Black_Hound</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2917@http://forumarchive.spadille.net/</guid>
<description><p>I was looking at forums saying how if you build something then they would destroy buildings that you built. So i had some ideas that are: If they try to destroy say a message that says this block does not belong to you. Or a little pop up will pop up in  the corner of your screen asking if you want to allow him/her to destroy your block. If you accept it you can go to the leader boards and decline the that player from destroying blocks. Comment on what you think of it!
</p></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
