|
|
|
New Ace of Spades Forums: http://buildandshoot.com/ |
|
|
|
This is based on my belief that AoS is a WAR GAME, not a WWI or WWII or Vietnam war game. Just, a war game. Just Suggestions. Also, to make the Cp more useful, you should be able to switch guns there. Examples: Power houses: Mounted Minigun: Mounted dual Railgun: Tri-mounted rocket launcher: Stealth guns: Semi-automatic Dual Handgun: Silent Sniper rifle. (mountable) Silenced Pistol: Soldier guns: Ak-74: Current Rifle: Piston rocket launcher: Again, Leave suggestions BELOW. This is MY list. If you want to make one go ahead. But dont say that im "wrong" or it doesn't fit the game. This is just a example. If you want to prove me wrong make another list. |
#24878 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
I think thats a great idea. |
#24880 WelshBoy7thst Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
Thank you. If you want to add on to it just do so :) |
#24893 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
I think that these guns are way too overpowered. Oh and wth is that power house? |
#24905 SIMOX Modifier Posted 14 years ago |
|
.....lets just try to add a pistol... |
#24906 GeneralE Commander in Arms Posted 14 years ago |
|
I think it'd be cool if a server host could decide what guns could be used on that particular server. I do like the ideas though, but adding them all in would make it excessive. |
#24909 Bubbzo Block Architect Posted 14 years ago |
|
You've said not to say that you're wrong, but I say, screw that. You're in a public forum, you've presented an idea, and I'm going to criticize it. I don't want to be at all troll-like, but I genuinely feel that this is a bad idea, and feel that the reasons why should be explained. I'm not interested in debating further than this... online debates almost never get anywhere, and your list, plus my argument, should present both sides as much as needed. To be blunt, there are way too many guns. I've heard people criticize ideas as being too much like COD, and other people criticize the first group for classifying any shooter with a collection of guns as COD. Both sides have their points, but this many different guns is just too many. Plus, a minigun that can destory blocks in two hits at a high rate of fire? Have you ever even heard of griefers? I don't mean to sound troll-like, but that's really a very, very bad idea. 80 rounds total is enough to destroy forty blocks... that's more than enough to destroy the average-sized structure. Most of the guns you've described are way too overpowered. One minigun could make a total mess of several bunkers, and while the user is, technically, vulnerable, the sheer amount of firepower would make shooting at it nearly suicidal. Then, the rail-gun. I assume you meant a rail-MOUNTED gun, a proven design, rather than a true rail-gun, of which there are only a few working prototypes in the world today. It's got a slower rate of fire, but the ability to take out two blocks in a line is also a griefer's dream-come true. Most of my structures have a two-block thick front to protect them from gunfire and grenades, but hacing to make them three blocks thick would make the field of view prohibitive. A two-block thick wall is already too thick to be much use in hillsides. This, like the minigun, would really underpower bunkers. The rocketlauncher's also a bad idea. The destructive capablity of a grenade is relatively easy to defend against, but 15 of them at long range? Bad idea, although slightly less griefing potential than the previous two powerhouse weapons. The stealth weapons aren't too much better. The sniper rifle is perhaps the best idea, but it's irritating enough to get sniped out of nowehere as it is. Given silenced sniper rifles, maps would fill with a few good spancampers in well-concealed locations, and a bunch of other people who get killed within five seconds of spawning unless they're REALLY lucky, and don't have any hope of finding their killers and avenging themselves. The pistol and dual-handguns make spray-'n'-pray practical, and that's also a bad thing. The standard rifles are a more mixed bunch. I obviously have no objections to the current rifle, but the AK-74 seems insufficiently different to make it worth the trouble of implementing. The only major difference is the high rate of fire. It would be like the standard rifle, with speedhacks. I don't like speedhackers, and I'm willing to bet you don't either (assuming you joined the game before the checksums imporved. If you didn't, you have no idea what I'm talking about. Ask Lexsym how mad she made a server using them). The rocket launcher isn't a totally rotten idea, but if used it would have to require two players to use, like many real infantry-issue rocket launchers, both current and obsolete. The small destructive area does lower griefing potential a bit, but overall I think the ability to snipe with rockets could be a problem. So, those are my opinions. Like I said, I'm not really interested in debating about them further, but please at least read them thoroughly and try to understand my points. Believe it or not, I DID think about them. |
#24916 1337101 Modifier Posted 14 years ago |
|
@Razor so wrong in so much many ways. also not very well explained. |
#24918 Mr.Kaputtnik Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
I'd agree too many weapons are a bad thing. The game is simple, so should the weapon choice. My idea: Rifle, Shotgun, Automatic, Dual Pistols. Details: http://www.aceofspadeswiki.com/index.php?title=User:TheGrandmaster#Weapons |
#24920 TheGrandmaster Moderator Posted 14 years ago |
|
Listen. All the weapons ive listen balance each other out, you guys are so absurd to change yet it is a BETA game, change is inevitable. 9 guns is not to many. See a noob using a minigun? Pull out a rocket launcher. 1337101 just doesn't like change. You are wrong. I mentioned overheating and other features. The minigun is VERY vulnerable. If your out in the open with it you have NO way to move. At all. all they have to do is flank your point of view, and attack from behind. The minigun is USELESS without backup, as the amount you have to get close to ruins the "go out and hide while firring" idea. And the "spray and pray" dosnt matter, because unless they can heat shot you EVERY time. There fucked. |
#24954 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
@Razor lol no |
#24955 Mr.Kaputtnik Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
My kaputtnik is just a troll, ignore him. and @ the grand master. |
#24957 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
I also agree with bubbo, and again, ANYONE can use these guns, so believe it or not, YOUR ON THE SAME FOOTING. Have a team full of rocketters coming at you? get with your team and do the same thing! This will force people to work with there TEAM |
#24960 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
@Razor i'm only trolling you. where did you find all these ideas? |
#24961 Mr.Kaputtnik Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
Lets see, the absurd tags you added. |
#24963 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
what? |
#24965 Mr.Kaputtnik Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
Gtfo nubfais. |
#24967 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
lol nerd talking why are you so offensive against homosexual people? |
#24969 Mr.Kaputtnik Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
Your just mad. |
#24971 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
Razor, believe it or not TheGrandmaster does actually think about his posts, and from what I can see he's been polite in his responses. Please, don't accuse people of being trolls without any reason other than "they don't agree with me." His opinions are perfectly justified from his point of view, and you'd do well to keep in mind that from his point of view, you're the one who's got things all wrong. He's not saying what he's saying because he wants to offend you, he's actually genuinely concerned that the game won't be any fun if your ideas are implemented. |
#25004 1337101 Modifier Posted 14 years ago |
|
4 or 5 simple weapons seems like it would fit the gameplay more. No OP weapons. |
#25006 Duhya Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
I was refering to YOU 1337. not Grandmaster. |
#25027 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
Hey, Razor. It's "you're", not "your". Try to not make simple grammatical errors before calling other people idiots, yeah? |
#25030 Bob Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
No, because you're sounds hella gay. Much better to say your. Also, fuck grammar. |
#25037 Razor Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
In terms of guns I think we should keep it simple other wise the game gets too complicated and unbalanced Shotgun Uzi Rifle I also think we should have capturable spawn points as it would make it much easier to win on maps like pinpoint which almost always start and end with neither side being able to push and capture the intel |
#25204 Ikaruga3 Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
@TheGrandmaster. I don't think and automatic rifle is really the best idea, and the pistols really dont seem to fit the spirit of the game (Akimbo-pistols, Really?). the shotgun could be fun though. (privately I see pistols as kinda useless, sidearms are only for officers, and unless there is a ranking system added [which I'm also against]. I would see them as too CAWADOOTY-ish) |
#25664 grendle Member Posted 14 years ago |
|
Cause you guys are wanting for un-balanced weapons then i will TSAR BOMBA! : Leg 2000 Type Thermonuclear weapon the perfect NEW GUN |
#25720 GeneralE Commander in Arms Posted 14 years ago |
|
hmm lot of Yuri's |
#25723 GeneralE Commander in Arms Posted 14 years ago |
|
^ Tsar Bomba > Thread. Seriously, most of these weapons are just...no. |
#25729 POMF Technological Solutions™ Director of Renovations Posted 14 years ago |
|
why not a TSAR BOMBA? |
#25761 GeneralE Commander in Arms Posted 14 years ago |
| RSS feed for this topic |
You must log in to post.
|
|
| Ace of Spades Game Forums is proudly powered by bbPress. // Theme by Mike Lothar |