I call first post 2nd page.

this idea was kinda like IF pistols was added, IF. not to added pistols, that was NOT the idea but this idea suports the pistol idea and.... what ever...

im just saying that your accuracy thing is jacked dog the revolver is going to be more accurate due to its slower rate of fire not the other way round dog

Well in order to discuss the mechanics of sidearms, you must add sidearms, which I am vehemently against, because it would be nothing more than eye candy/useless feature.

i would say it would be usefull for the smg class if it was usefull at all

dude youere unfair, im likeing the looting corpes idea and youre hating on the pistol idea....

Alucard its just an idea, ideas are like game in bete, they can change :) but dont you think they revolver (as in the op) can be a litle to over powerd if its accuracy is as good as the 9mm or the 45? 3 shots in the legs/arms = dead (34 dmg) 2 shot in the cheast = dead (50 dmg) 1 shot in the head = dead (101 dmg)

no what im saying is in real life a revolver is more accurate meaning your accuracty table is completly fuck up so maybe if you stop living in call of duty and read up on a thing called science you would understand these things

alucard this is a game, end disscuon.

Me disliking an idea does not mean I'm being unfair. I simply do not see a place for a sidearm in this game. It has no place. At all.

And also, alucard is right. Your chart is Bull. Revolvers are very accurate weapons, while 9mm weapons tend to be much more inaccurate.

Observe: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ_fPY7axmU
Impossible if Revolvers weren't accurate.

yes alucrad is right but think about the balance. wait an min then can you re-read the OP?

"pleas comment on what you want/dont want."
I don't want CAWADOOTY kids making threads about pistols.
I don't want pistols or sidearms in this game.
And if [ever] implemented [and hopefully it will never be] I don't want inaccurate revolvers.

Lrn2read

fuck you for calling me a cod kid, and by inaccurat i men like gun A is spot on B its a little off and gun D is a little more off then gun B

listen i was a marine for 3 years i think i know about guns
at least a little more than you

yes and a full out war SIMULATOR wont be fun

gun D
Range: bad at medium range but good at short
Ammo: 5 in mag 20 max
Dmg: 50 to the cheast 34 to the limbs 100 to the head
"How good it hits": not good

Yeah, just a little off, huh?
Go back to cawadooty and play with your [unrealistic soldiers who carry] sidearms there.

This isn't a simulator. You can't build fortresses out of blocks. Derp.

And I don't know about you, but ARMA 2 is plenty fun.

dude i mean if you dont know about firearms dont talk about them you gotta learn that call of duty lies to sell

i dont fucking play cod. its just an idea, ideas are like game in bete, they can change

if you keep talking like you know all sombody will shoot you down
.....worse than me and thunder did

But there is no reason to implement a pistol. Like at all. The only reason I can think of is "I RAN OUT OF AMMO BECAUSE I LIKE TO CAMP THE ENEMY SPAWN", which can be fixed by looting bodies.
Instead of a useless, weak sidearm we add corpse looting.

/thread

i agree being able to slavage stuff from corpses will end this side arm crap for ever!

cant you just leave me alone for at lest a minut

as long as headshots are instant kill with it then pistols would be a cool addition.

^^^
Wut? Speak English child.

We are against sidearms because we actually know things about military and firearms. Unlike most video games, pistols are very powerful. They are also fairly accurate. I have seen people shoot cards at 100 yards with a revolver. It does not help if you resort to immature statements and asking us to "leave me alone for at lest a minut". If you want sidearms, be a big boy and debate and argue. At the very least take our ideas in mind.

Onto the idea itself. I agree that a sidearm would be useless. You never run out of ammo (Unless you are using an SMG) against decent people on a decent map. If a pistol was a primary weapon, I see some light on that. Also, think about the guns and caliber for a second. Not only do we need a pistol (real life) to base it on, it should be fairly balanced and realistic.

How about we fix the networking code and balance the SMG and then worry about adding a [crappy, unnecessary, useless, eye candy, space taking] pistol?

^^^
I'm up for that.

now you better pray that you dont say that shit about my mother (R.I.P) ever again or ill track you down and pull out your teeth with a pipewrench and then put them in a cake and make you eat it!

you have just made me your enemy and i wont stop till i have my vengance!

^^^
Remember, as long as the bullet isn't near any vital organs, anywhere will do (Arms, Legs, testicles, shoulder). Simply inflicting damage using a firearms by itself will do as well.

i preffer my way