Didn't the Nazis have UFOs?

@Tyler: I don't like vehicles because it'll make things messy IMO. I like running from building to building without fear of getting run over/ gunned down by MG fire/ blasted by a tank cannon.

As for the sprinting option, give players the ability to sprint around 5 - 15 seconds at most.

Well, how messy? I mean, obvious cap on vehicles and stuff. It also allows more tactics and the ability to get a panzerfaust.

bobbunny you are such a troll around here. Vehicles, at least controleld by humans shouldnt happen. Im having hard enough time the past few days to get some kills since teammates are always sitting in front of me and alwasy somehow manage to get in the way, imagine how those huge vehicles would be in game?

So you say. Why do you think I am a troll?

OT: I would imagine that those huge vehicles would be getting blown up as they are probably perceived as a higher threat than some soldiers. Advice on getting kills, go solo and dig a little hidey hole.

you just suggest really bad ideas :P
My kills are fine, I mean maps like goons haven, pinpoint, and all those 1 level maps.

Name 5, and I argue that making ideas that you believe are bad does not make me a troll. :'(

HALO... IN WW1!
t=There should be big giant anti-aircraft guns, also big navy ships like the ones surrounding Britain!
Hurricanes for planes since they were from ww1, also deployable machine guns(must be deployed to shoot) :)

Winston Churchill, you of all people should know the Hurricane was a WW2 fighter. What you mean are Sopwiths, Aircos and Se5s.

@Bobbunny: I just don't like to be running towards my next firing spot only to find that I've been run over by a speeding jeep. Or blasted to pieces by a Tank that I don't have any ability to destroy. (Unless Ben adds weapon classes in this game.)

@Nowa90: He was definitely NOT trolling. Just asking. :/

look, if you really don't like the idea of vehicles because you are some holed up COD nerd, I'm sure if Ben would implement vehicles he would put a option somewhere for server admins to allow or not allow certain types of vehicles or no vehicles at all.

Vehicles is what gives the sense of a true and realistic war, imagine for just one moment. The buildings around you are crumbling, jets whizz by your head locked in a immense dogfight, the blades of a humming helicopter drops in paratroopers as reinforcements as they blast away their RPG's at the nearby enemy tank suppressing your allies, a massive wave of enemy AA artillery booms ahead as a jeep rolls by telling you to get on the 50 cal.

^That, my friends, is a true war. (try Battlefield 3)

Ahem.
Sopwith Camels flying above, trying to take the edge on the enemies. Paratroopers going down armed with panzerfausts. Armor is rolling in at the bridge, suddenly, satchel charges on it and BOOM GOES DA BRIDGE. All the while with fun going around.

My poem seems a bit more....intense.

My story seems a bit more....realistic.

Not exactly.

Jets, RPGs, Helicopters, paratroopers from helicopters, talking jeeps?

Fine, I get your point. I'm just one blade of grass in a field of thousands anyways. >.>'

Sorry, I'm just more of a ground-pounder than anything else. I like to keep things simple.

Also, I haven't played CoD for years now. (Last online one I played was CoD:4) I have no idea how things go in Multiplayer.

Cargo Planes.
Air dropping armies and armor over our enemies.

We need fuel efficient, unarmored supply trucks. Those are the real backbone of any war.

Remember this is supposed to be WWI. So why not have classic WWI planes instead of Jets. And the planes can be used as UAV and to have dog fights with other planes. However the plane cannot shoot at enemies on the ground. But to keep the game fair theres a Rule of Engagement for the pilots. They can only shoot at enemies on the floor if the enemies shot at them. Now we will also need AA guns to shoot down the planes. BUt besides that, i agree completely with you. Vehicles will be a great expansion to this game!

"Remember this is supposed to be WWI."

Ben said there isnt a set period of time so he isnt held back in what he can or cant add. He also said jeeps trucks etc wouldnt work due to the blocky landscape, although choppers and boats may be possible.

How about this: Each team gets a helicopter, and there's 2 team-neutral boats in the river. The helicopter and boat spawns would become landing pads and docks, respectively; the vehicles always respawn at these spots and are fully healed if they're returned to their spawns. Each vehicle can hold a few passengers (3-5). Armaments would at most consist of a single machine gun and at minimum consist of the passengers themselves firing their weapons. Vehicles have a pretty decent amount of health, say 500 each, and use the collapsing building effect when they're destroyed; everybody in it will then fall out and probably die. You may not carry the intel in a chopper, but you may carry it in a boat (so helicopters aren't horribly overpowered). If the pilot of a helicopter or the driver of a boat is kicked or disconnects, the first passenger gets it; otherwise, it returns to its spawn.

Ground vehicles just wouldn't work in this game, and planes wouldn't have room to take off for blue.

look, if you really don't like the idea of vehicles because you are some holed up COD nerd, I'm sure if Ben would implement vehicles he would put a option somewhere for server admins to allow or not allow certain types of vehicles or no vehicles at all.

Vehicles is what gives the sense of a true and realistic war, imagine for just one moment. The buildings around you are crumbling, jets whizz by your head locked in a immense dogfight, the blades of a humming helicopter drops in paratroopers as reinforcements as they blast away their RPG's at the nearby enemy tank suppressing your allies, a massive wave of enemy AA artillery booms ahead as a jeep rolls by telling you to get on the 50 cal.

You lost me at jets dogfighting. Actually that's where Battlefield lost me too.

And really? renaming your thread to make it look like a fresh one? That's just low.